Ah, it’s Oscars season! The most prestigious yet shallow fortress of cinematic excellence, which has become a platform for Academy voters to analyse the merits of every nominated project as they see fit. Yes, it’s that time of year when even the most seasoned cinephiles admit they haven’t seen half the nominees.
We believe the time has come to realise that these so-called voters base their choices on a sophisticated process of elimination, guided by a deep-seated longing for a good nap and a strong therapist recommendation. You think they watch all the nominated movies before casting their votes? Oh, please! Don’t kid yourselves, guys!
A recent breakthrough story from Variety has disclosed the disturbing inconsistencies associated with the voting procedure for the 2025 Oscars. According to the prominent outlet, Ralph Fiennes, acclaimed for Conclave and a recent SAG win, faces Oscar voting anomalies. Despite widespread praise, some voters wrongly believed he had won previously, denying him their Best Actor vote.
This doesn’t make any sense, as Adrien Brody bagged the Best Actor Oscar for The Pianist (2002), and now he has been nominated in the same category for The Brutalist (which is also nominated for Best Picture). And as per Variety’s latest report, many voters have revealed that Brody was their favourite choice for this year’s Academy Awards.
Another shocking finding from the outlet’s report was that the Oscars’ Best Picture system favours consistent second- or third-place votes over solely first-place tallies. The Brutalist lacks these, despite passionate support. This means Anora, Conclave, Wicked, and A Complete Unknown are strong contenders with frequent second-place votes.
Other nominated entries, such as Dune: Part Two, The Substance, and Nickel Boys may struggle with fewer top votes. The process reveals voting errors and strategic ballot placement, suggesting Conclave or Anora as likely winners.
One more major shocking disclosure about the Oscars’ flawed voting system for the Best Picture category has been revealed by Entertainment Weekly. According to the platform, an anonymous Oscar director has exposed a disheartening lack of enthusiasm for this year’s nominees.
The director confessed to EW that he hadn’t watched crucial films like The Substance and I’m Still Here and even struggled to finish Dune: Part Two. While initially leaning towards Anora or The Brutalist, he found both flawed, describing one as “silly” and the other as “exploitative.”
The sarcasm and lack of seriousness in these voters’ opinions clearly indicate that they don’t give a damn about the Oscars’ movie voting system. The fact that an actor who has won before gets votes, while someone who hasn’t does not, show that voting is not based on merit. Ultimately, this lack of passion among voters undermines the perception of the Oscars as a celebration of genuine artistic achievement in the eyes of the public.
These revelations expose the Oscars as a potentially flawed process rather than a true measure of cinematic excellence. If the Academy Awards are seen as a product of ignorance, inconsistency, and apathy, their credibility will be severely damaged. This could further lead to a decline in viewership of the event in the coming years. Stay tuned for more updates.
We’re hiring!
We are hiring two full-time junior to mid-level writers with the option to work remotely. You need to work a 5-hour shift and be available to write. Interested candidates should email their sample articles to [email protected]. Applications without a sample article will not be considered.
