Vijay 69, with its prospect of Anupam Kher as a 69-year-old man who’s had it all and wants to have that one remaining thing: completing a triathlon, has received mixed views; of course, it brings forth an important question: is the film really getting the response it deserves?
As much as there are people celebrating it for its warm narrative and more so for its lead actor’s performance, there are many others who call it predictable and lacking in creativity. The difference says plenty about the struggles contemporary Bollywood finds it trying to reach for in terms of depth and originality.
On paper, Vijay 69 promises all sorts of feel-good narrative on aging and ambition; it’s odd to see a film like this centre around a uracentric elderly protagonist: old Thalapathy roles come flooding back. It executes the concept badly.
The film is too heavy-handed with predictable plot points, which dilutes its impact. Vijay seeks glory as a foul-mouthed old man, something that reads more like a tired character than a nuanced exploration of that character.
More than many reviews, it is the second half that makes the movie go crumby with predictability and remove suspense from it. This results in there being no surprise or weight when Vijay walks the path- The narrative arc is so predetermined that it takes away the stakes of the fight Vijay will engage in.
As critic noted: “There’s no way that Vijay can fail: he will prevail”. This means there is no genuine conflict in the story, which not only makes the movie artificial but also seems to have emotions missed.
It was amazing to watch, Anupam Kher brings Vijay Mathew into focus with a seasoned performance. But the script, they all say, is unimaginative and even Kher’s talent cannot help it come out of the mud.
Chunky Panday and Mihir Ahuja are great, but it’s not that one would know much about them because their characters are underdeveloped and restricted to stereotypes instead of bringing them out fully fleshed out and mature individuals.
The movie tries to convey a message about being age just a number, whereas this message appears in the movie but gets lost because the movie goes by all the formulaic story-telling. It is really praiseworthy that Vijay 69 tries to encourage the elder people to work for their dreams but at the cost of new insights or perspectives on aging. The movie actually supports and perpetuates societal views on age and capability.
Vijay 69might not be getting the praise it merits from critics because it doesn’t push the boundaries of its genre. Despite Kher’s outstanding performance against a mediocre background, the film’s shallow plot and lack of nuance leave a lot to be desired. It is just another example of how Bollywood has lost out on a chance to meaningfully examine difficult subjects related to aging.
Vijay 69 serves as a reminder that merely presenting an inspiring premise is insufficient; it must be backed by good writing and inventive direction in order to fully resonate with viewers, who are increasingly seeking authenticity and uniqueness in storytelling.
We’re hiring!
We are hiring two full-time junior to mid-level writers with the option to work remotely. You need to work a 5-hour shift and be available to write. Interested candidates should email their sample articles to [email protected]. Applications without a sample article will not be considered.
