Rating: 6/10
| Platform: Voot Select | Genre: Drama/Mystery |
Skin and swear: No skin show, comprises sequences with strong language
What Is the Story About?
A young, ambitious lawyer Niharika Singh is ousted from her law firm for standing up to a colleague raped by her superior. The colleague’s decision to step back from pressing rape charges against him baffles Niharika, as she lands a job at the firm owned by country’s most popular criminal lawyer Janardhan Jaitley. Niharika’s dysfunctional past keeps haunting her – be it her childhood or her failed love life. Incidentally, Janardhan Jaitley’s son Akshay is her ex and worse, she’s allotted a case that takes her back to those dark chapters in her life she didn’t want to revisit. She’s simultaneously asked to take up the case of Meher Salam pro bono, who’s yet to be executed despite a hang-unto-death verdict pronounced by the court 15 years ago (after she murders four of her family members). The cases help her come to terms with the stark realities of the judicial system (and justice) like no other.
Performances?
Piyush Mishra’s delicious dialogue modulation lends his character an aura of the old school villain – you sense his joy as a performer as he utters his well-written chaste Hindi lines with timely mythological references. Kubbra Sait’s penchant to perform diverse roles reflects in Illegal, though her part as a victim of capital punishment is vague and underwrought. Deepak Tijori’s casting may have been an attempt to add nostalgic value to a 90s kid, but it’s disappointing that he isn’t in great form here (as a drunkard, elitist father who could go to any extent to protect his son). Kitu Gidwani gets a poorly written role bereft of logic, though Parul Gulati improves from where she left at ‘The Raikars Case’. Satyadeep Mishra makes his presence felt, though the character’s flawed sense of morality hurts.
Analysis
In a show where the primary argument is between consensual sex and rape, the filmmaker makes a few interesting narrative choices. The female advocate represents the accused man while a male lawyer represents the female victim – the intensity of the battle between the genders is magnified smartly. Just when Illegal progresses to be that full-blown courtroom drama discussing gender privilege, power dynamics with staged witnesses, tampered pieces of evidence (providing little knowledge of what would have happened that fateful night), a flurry of subplots (work like speed-breakers) threaten to dilute the momentum.
The issue with long-winded storytelling format is not knowing where to stop. Make no mistake, Illegal is extremely well-researched, but it overstuffs the audiences with information – so much that the debate about ‘one size fits all’ laws and capital punishment could have been a separate documentary. The filmmaker merely uses the case about capital punishment as an excuse to deviate the attention from the core issue of the story – it’s neither well-established nor poignant enough to evince interest. More than the never-ending backstories and subplots, their timing in the screenplay proves to be a major hindrance to the storytelling.
Music and Other Departments?
The biggest conflict for a composer in a show like Illegal involving a small bunch of characters is to strike a fine balance between maintaining the consistency of the score (for every character) and not sounding repetitive at the same time. Illegal’s music score aces that mix right and is riveting for a significant duration. The aesthetics of the various backdrops, the colour-play and the finesse in the execution lend a definite visual fillip to Illegal. The writer Reshu Nath pens a smart story on the whole, though the show would have made a stronger impact in a less-incestuous setup.
Highlights?
Strong performances
Riveting screenplay
Authentic courtroom setting
Drawbacks?
Too many subplots distract the show from its sole objective
The entire debate about capital punishment
Did I Enjoy It?
For a major portion, yes
Will You Recommend It?
Yes
Review by Srivathsan Nadadhur