What Is the Story About?
The second season of Loser focuses on the journeys of its lead protagonists, Suri (Priyadarshi), Rubi (Kalpika Ganesh) and Wilson (Shahshank). How are they reacting to the new challenges thrown at them? And how it reveals their truer inner self is the series’ basic plot.
Performances?
Priyadarshi continues with his sincere efforts as Suri. The second season offers him nothing new except for a transformation in characterization. He is effective, as usual, but the sheer routineness doesn’t let it shine.
Kalpika Ganesh’s part is the better one performance-wise, as in showcasing some dramatic skills. The sequences are again very typical of the space. However, she does her best to make it compelling.
Shashank gets the best lines of the season, and that’s it. There is nothing much to add to her performance we have seen previously. Also, despite the best efforts by the actor in what can be termed as a role of the lifetime, the intensity isn’t still at the required level. It is felt more in the subtle and calmer moments than aggressive ones where he is okay.
Analysis
Abhilash Reddy and Shravan Madala direct the second season of Loser. The former is the show’s creator, who also directed the first season. Loser season two is an extension of the first, focusing on individual characters and how it shapes their future.
In one of the earlier episodes, the new coach asks Suri about his ‘purpose’ for playing the sport. Remember, he is a National Champion already. The same thing could be asked to the makers watching the second season. For until the end, it feels like a needless extension of the first one with no genuine ‘purpose’.
Right from the start, the different characters charter a predictable journey. The lead hero of sorts, Suri, gets a rise and fall plot, whereas Rubi is finally coming of age breaking the shackles. And finally, it is the redemption of sorts for Wilson via his son. These three predictable threads are merged to create a narrative that is as predictable as it comes.
What makes matters worse and the ‘troubles’ faced by the protagonist. They are one cliché after the other without any respite. So, you have Suri, who is already struggling to fit in a government job; he has multiple issues stacked against him, one after the one. The reaction to a National Champian at the workplace and a look at his future strike the right note. If it was to highlight the miserable position of the National Champions, we already got that through a well-executed canteen sequence; the rest feels purposefully tacked on.
The same issue persists with Ruby but in a different space of domestic abuse. Luckily, this is not the case with Wilson, but it has its banality problem.
Amidst all the mundane narratives, what works is the creative connection of the different characters to each other, knowingly or unknowingly. It is what worked in the first season as well. But, it has a neat undercurrent theme and message to bolster the overall story. It is missing in the second season, even though the message we get here is also nice.
The ending with the dialogues on the importance of losing and learning from it are well done. But, it comes far too late to have a significant impact.
Overall, Loser 2 has the same issues with the stories and drama as the first, they are utterly predictable and cliché ridden. It is the theme and message it wants to convey which is essential. And it is what makes the second season a passable watch, again, despite the shortcomings.
Other Artists?
Actors Shayaji Shinde, Satya Krishnan, Pavani Gangireddy, Annie, and Abhay Bethiganty reprise their roles from the first season. They have far lesser scope here compared to the first. And some of those actors had sketchy parts in the first season itself.
Danya Balakrishnan is the new addition to the cast with a significant role. She is alright. Ravi Varma is good in the brief time he gets. Harshit Reddy is the one who has a decent role among the actors who were also of the first one. He is alright. Giri and Surya are a welcome presence just because of their familiarity. The former is wasted, though, whereas the latter is acceptable.
Music and Other Departments?
The music by Sriram Madduri is okay. The background score is comparatively better. The production quality has improved from the first part. It is visible in Naresh Ramaduari’s work as a cinematographer. Anil Kumar P’s work as an editor could be sharper. The writing is good in parts, particularly those related to the core message.
Highlights?
Casting
Screenplay
Ending Message
Drawbacks?
Formulaic Narrative
Clichéd Drama
Predictable Story
Did I Enjoy It?
Yes, In PartsWill You Recommend It?
Yes, But With ReservationsLoser 2 Review by Binged Bureau
We’re hiring!
We are hiring two full-time junior to mid-level writers with the option to work remotely. You need to work a 5-hour shift and be available to write. Interested candidates should email their sample articles to [email protected]. Applications without a sample article will not be considered.
